Search for: "Minor v. US Department of the Treasury"
Results 1 - 20
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
This principle was reaffirmed in a recent decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Armentano v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 11:39 am
In 1983, however, the Supreme Court’s decision in INS v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
ProPublica – Andrew Suozzo | Published: 8/2/2022 Forty members of Congress asked the IRS and the Treasury Department to investigate what the lawmakers termed an “alarming pattern” of right-wing advocacy groups registering with the tax agency as churches, a move that allows the organizations to shield themselves from some financial reporting requirements and makes it easier to avoid audits. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:41 am
Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) the identities of their beneficial owners and applicants. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:41 am
Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) the identities of their beneficial owners and applicants. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:38 am
Department of Treasury found that “borrowers in 32 black neighborhoods [were] five times as likely to refinance in the subprime market than borrowers in white neighborhoods,” even when controlling for income. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 6:01 am
As important as the nugget is, the Treasury Department didn’t particularly highlight it. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 7:08 am
A church-owned buffet restaurant and its televangelist owner must defend against the Department of Labor’s allegations that they violated the FLSA by using unpaid church volunteers to operate the Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, restaurant. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
Even if it did, was the use of the power proportionate to the legitimate aim? [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:30 pm
First, the Department of Treasury regularly issues “temporary” regulations without notice and comment. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
As a result, there was room for the Treasury Department to interpret the new provision in that manner. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:40 am
The investigation was performed by a taskforce consisting of Gardendale Police, The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Jefferson County District Attorney’s Office, United States Secret Service, United States Marshals, United States Treasury agents (T Feds), FBI agents, Wal-Mart global security, and other state, local and federal law enforcement agencies. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:40 am
The investigation was performed by a taskforce consisting of Gardendale Police, The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Jefferson County District Attorney’s Office, United States Secret Service, United States Marshals, United States Treasury agents (T Feds), FBI agents, Wal-Mart global security, and other state, local and federal law enforcement agencies. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Department of the Treasury to redeem matured savings bonds that are owned by a state pursuant to a valid judgment of escheatment but that the state cannot identify by serial number without Treasury’s assistance; and (3) whether the interpretation of federal law adopted by the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
Treasury Department — method that federal employees are to use to claim that they were fired in violation of their constitutional rights 10-9995 — Wood v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit erred in holding that, although the challenged reforms did not adversely affect minority voting, the North Carolina legislature nonetheless intended to deny African Americans the right to vote; and (3) whether statistical racial disparities in the use of voting mechanisms or procedures are relevant to a vote denial claim under Section 2. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit erred in holding that, although the challenged reforms did not adversely affect minority voting, the North Carolina legislature nonetheless intended to deny African Americans the right to vote; and (3) whether statistical racial disparities in the use of voting mechanisms or procedures are relevant to a vote denial claim under Section 2. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-698, and DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
